THE EVOLUTION OF SYNC: AUDIO NETWORK’S GREAT ESCAPE 2026 PANEL
At The Great Escape 2026, we brought together leaders from across music, media and entertainment to explore how visual storytelling is evolving in a rapidly changing landscape. From the era of linear TV to today's platform-first, creator-led world, the conversation dives into what these shifts mean for artists, audiences, brands and the future of sync.
The panel covers how music is being discovered through visual media, the growing influence of creators, and the opportunities and challenges facing the industry as content consumption continues to evolve. We are living in a moment where every company is becoming a media company, every individual creator is a brand, and audiences expect emotionally engaging storytelling absolutely everywhere. No longer do you need a TV licence or a subscription to access premium content - documentaries, podcasts, YouTube, social are all the norm now. So what does that mean for music? Read on to find out.
The Panel:
- Rebecca Hodges - General Manager, UK, Nordics & Japan, Audio Network.
- Peter Bradbury - Director of Music Services, Sky, overseeing music across all of Sky's output: sport, drama, scripted and non-scripted content, ads, and primaries.
- Jordan Schwarzenberger - Founder & CEO, Arcade Group, the management company behind the Sidemen, one of the UK's most-watched YouTube groups.
- Charlotte Mason - Head of Production, Insanity, running the company's in-house production division across podcast, digital content, and talent IP development.

How Did We Get Here? The Sync Landscape Then and Now
Rebecca: Peter, you've been doing this for a couple of decades. What did sync look like ten years ago versus today?
Peter: The desire to choose the best track - that hasn't changed. It's the mechanisms and thinking behind it that have evolved. There's an exponential amount of content now. Way more on TV than there ever was, let alone what's online.
What we've been thinking about more intentionally over the last five to ten years is how we use music to genuinely elevate a show. For a drama, we'll think well in advance - choosing the right composer, sometimes a surprising one. A couple of years ago we did Midwich Cuckoos, which is based on a very old novel, and we chose an electronic score. Not what you'd expect, but that was the point.
We also think about the title music, about working with the brand and marketing team - if we can work with artists or composers who can make themselves visible, that enhances the whole show.
In terms of what's actually changed in the music choices themselves: there used to be commercial music, library music, and commission music, and you just picked one. Now it's much more fluid. A real trend over the last couple of years has been taking commercial tracks, splitting the stems, and doing something completely different with them. We used Radiohead's Everything in Its Right Place for Day of the Jackal - it went on an early internal sizzle tape and just captured the mood of the show perfectly. It has that intrigue running through it, and so does the show. As the production developed, it crept into the promo and eventually into the first episode itself.
Rebecca: And from a licensing perspective, an absolute nightmare.
Peter: If Radiohead and Beggars Banquet want to get involved, they get involved. If they don't, they don't. But I think broadly, using commercial music in traditional media has become more difficult over time. Broadcasters and producers are now using slightly less commercial music and more commissioned and library music - partly because clearance got harder, partly because people want more unique approaches, and partly because library music has just got so much better. A lot of it has vocals now. In the right scene, there's genuinely no difference between a great library track and a commercial one.
The Era of Self-Commissioning
Rebecca: Charlotte, podcast is one of the fastest-growing mediums right now. When you're working with talent and commissioning content yourselves - not waiting two years for a drama to be greenlit - where does music come into your thinking?
Charlotte: We're genuinely in the era of self-commissioning. When I first joined Insanity five years ago, the normal route for talent was: have an idea, go to the traditional commissioners - the platforms, the broadcasters - and say, "please can this get made?" Usually they'd say no, sometimes yes. But now talent have recognised they already have the audience, and they have the means of production under their own banners. They're far more involved in editorial decisions - including music - because it's their IP.
My role at Insanity is really about advocating for talent to stop being commission-driven and start building their own shows, their own IP, becoming their own creative and editorial directors.
Rebecca: Jordan, your world is vast.
Jordan: It is, and I think sync for creators barely existed until quite recently. Over the last five years or so, as YouTube has become what it is, creators have built actual production companies. They're media brands. And that means they have to act like one - they have to serve their audience at the highest level, and that means taking music seriously.
The Sidemen, for example, put out around 15 pieces of content every week. They reach about 50% of all UK Gen Z. Music runs through all of it, because YouTube rewards retention and satisfaction, and music enhances content enormously. Compare that to YouTube content from ten years ago - the production values are night and day.
A good example is Inside - the reality show the Sidemen self-commissioned for YouTube. They spent around £1.2 million on it. The title track absolutely blew up. It became sonic branding for the show, recognisable to the point where it became a meme in its own right. People were coming back to it every day expecting to hear it. For a YouTube group to have a show with a theme song that takes on a life of its own - that shows music is no longer a side consideration for creators. It's an essential part of the IP.
Music as Sonic Branding - and How to Pitch Into That World
Rebecca: So for anyone in this room who's a publisher, a composer, an artist - how do you actually get your music into the biggest shows on YouTube?
Jordan: It's about forging relationships with the editors. In the world of YouTube, editors are arguably as important as the talent on screen. All the creative choices - including music - are really made by them. Someone like the lead editor on a major YouTube channel is your way in, not the creator themselves, who are busy doing the on-screen stuff.
Original composition is also something that hasn't really taken off on YouTube yet. Mr Beast did a Hans Zimmer composition - that's a sign of the times. It's only going to become more common as top creators have both the budgets and the connections to commission properly. So I'd say: find the right editor, build that relationship, and also think about original work.
Peter: Very similar on the TV side. We have a music supervision team, and they genuinely like hearing from people. They like being pointed towards music they might not know. On a practical level: make it easily playable, easily downloadable, all the metadata in place. And it's got to be good.
Different types of content have different gatekeepers. For our eleven sports channels, the music team pitch playlists constantly - there's a really good entry point there. For non-scripted it's the editors. For dramas it's really about understanding what productions are in development and who the director is, what their taste is. You have to find the right person for the right track.
Charlotte: I'd completely agree. We're not really targeted by composers or artists at Insanity, but we'd welcome it - especially now that we're commissioning original music for podcasts. If anyone wants to be added to the books and given a brief to write original music for a show, that's genuinely something we'd be interested in.
The Copyright Headache
Rebecca: Let's talk about copyright challenges, because this is probably the biggest practical issue creators face.
Jordan: It's the killer. You make a video, you think it's great, and then there are five seconds from a track that isn't cleared, and all the revenue goes to the rights holder - as it should, I'm not bitter about it. But YouTube's copyright detection has become incredibly sophisticated. It can pick up anything. If you want a video monetised, you cannot have any unlicensed music in it. That's driving the need for library music in a way that wasn't the case five years ago, because YouTube wasn't as good at flagging it back then.
It's also part of the professionalisation of creators as an industry. Even smaller creators understand copyright now in a way they simply didn't before.
Charlotte: I'd add that the industry is moving so fast that legislation genuinely can't keep up. Every new platform has its own rules - Substack, Twitch, Kick. And on every platform you have to know what you're doing. We find we almost always go for a blanket licence across all platforms, just for consistency of the brand. If the same show appeared with different music in different places, it wouldn't be as recognisable. I'm Captain Safety - I'll always err on the side of making it as safe as possible.
Peter: From the TV side, this is one of the real structural problems with commercial music. You might have a brilliant drama that uses a commercial track perfectly. You can clear it for TV. But then when you try to clip it up and put it online, suddenly you're in a whole different clearance conversation. You end up with great content you can't share online, which is genuinely frustrating. That's another reason the profile of commercial music in TV content has quietly declined - library and commission music are just easier to work with across platforms.
"Creative always comes first, and commercial comes a close second - but copyright safety is always wrapped up in that. We encourage people to be absolutely aspirational in what they want to use, and then we work backwards from there." - Peter Bradbury, Sky
Where’s the Money? Budgets Across Platforms
Rebecca: The budgets for long-form commissioned content are traditionally strong. But for social and creator content - are those budgets rising to meet the moment?
Charlotte: On the podcast side, budgets are increasing more than we've ever seen, and the music line in that budget is better than it's ever been. I remember when we'd have about £10 for a library track. Now we're commissioning original music. The production demands have gone up so dramatically - podcast sets look like TV sets now - and the budgets reflect that.
Brand-funded content is a big part of this too. When a brand is behind a show hosted by talent, it unlocks a genuinely exciting production budget. That trend is only growing.
Peter: In TV it's more mixed. The arrival of the streamers - Netflix, Amazon, Apple - created a massive acceleration in the market, but that's tapered off. There's a lot less non-scripted content being made now; I'd say it's fallen about 50%, and I'm not exaggerating. Non-scripted just doesn't drive subscribers the way premium drama does. So what we've decided over the last couple of years is to concentrate spend on high-end drama - fewer of them, but bigger and harder-hitting.
Online budgets from Sky are increasing though, and we're working out more deliberately what we want to do in that standalone online space, not just content that supports a main show.

Who Owns the Music?
Rebecca: Charlotte, when you commission original music for a podcast, who owns it?
Charlotte: Normally the talent. Everything we take on is owned by them as part of their IP. Creators today have never been more entrepreneurial - it's not enough anymore to just show up and be paid. They want to build content empires, and that includes owning the music.
Rebecca: Peter, you wear two hats here - you look after music across Sky's output but you also run your own publishing company. How does ownership work from your side?
Peter: We commission somewhere between 800 and 1,000 pieces of music a year across dramas, ads, documentaries, short form. We acquire the rights to all of it. We work with the composers - it's always a partnership - and we want to make sure they're happy, that we can release original soundtracks and take them worldwide. But for the IP to be usable across all the things we need to do with it, we need to own it. It would be pointless otherwise.
The Future: Micro-Communities, Trust, and the End of Renting Audiences
Rebecca: Let's think about the next five years. Where are the opportunities?
Jordan: I think we're heading toward a continuing decentralisation of attention. The big institutions no longer control what connects at a cultural level - it's just harder and harder for them to do that. If you follow the logic of personalisation all the way through, you end up with very small micro-communities rather than a monoculture. Everyone's online experience is essentially one of one.
What that means for creators is they're building micro-towns rather than big worlds - smaller but much more deeply connected communities. The Sidemen's Side Plus membership is a good example: there have been marriages through it, people have Side Plus tattoos, they travel to the charity match. They pay for it and feel genuinely invested. Shit's 'n' Giggles have around 50,000 people on their Patreon. They sell out venues worldwide, and the majority of the audience are their members.
So I think you'll see social platforms used for awareness and discovery, funnelling down into small, local, paying communities. I think that model will apply everywhere - music, film, podcast, entertainment. And I think it's actually healthier, because you don't have a big corporate institution controlling culture the way you once did.
Charlotte: Hard agree. The only thing I'd add is that audiences will hold more power than ever before, because wherever they send their attention is where content continues to be made. In podcasting and YouTube, the numbers are transparent - you know immediately what's working. That accountability is only going to grow.
Rebecca: And for musicians and composers - does the creator mindset apply to them too?
Jordan: Absolutely. The musicians who are doing best right now think like creators. They try to connect in the same way, build local communities, find ways to communicate visually. Those are the ones having big successes. The principles apply to everyone - whether you're behind the scenes or in front of the mic. Now really is the moment to lean into it, even if it feels strange. Even someone deeply behind the scenes has a pocket of audience they can nurture. Everyone has that chance today.
Charlotte: And whoever is commissioning that music will want to leverage the audience that comes with it. If you can bring an audience, that's an even more compelling reason to commission your music. Ownership and reach become the same conversation.
Brands as the New Entertainment Hubs
Jordan: The next era is brands becoming commissioners and creators themselves. We've come out of that highly transactional influencer marketing world - renting audiences - and TikTok really splintered how consumers view content. It created an arms race for the For You page. Individual content has to travel now, which is a very different world.
What that means for brands is that renting an audience from a creator with no guarantee of reach is increasingly high-risk. A lot of publishers are just running paid campaigns to prop up declining organic reach - and brands are starting to clock that they could own the asset themselves for less money. So brands are going to become commissioners. They'll make their own shows, their own podcasts, eventually their own dramas and comedies. And that means the need for music becomes vast.
"For sync, it's only going to explode. As more and more people rush into long-form content, the need becomes universal. I can only see it going one way." - Jordan Schwarzenberger, Arcade Group
Quick Fire: What Is the Industry Underestimating?
Jordan: The creative mindset. Musicians leveraging their own audiences. If you can find a way to visually communicate your expertise as an artist, that's leverage - and leverage increases value.
Charlotte: The role talent are playing in commissioning. In a new world, a presenter doesn't just front a show - they might be choosing the music that goes on it.
Peter: This might be controversial, but I think the commercial music industry is underestimating how easily content creators can decide not to use their music. The publishing industry has made it progressively more difficult to use commercial tracks, assuming it'll still be fine. I think that tide is turning, and it's going in the other direction.
What’s Coming That Nobody’s Talking About Yet?
Jordan: Rebellion against AI content. People are already hitting the point where they look at something and genuinely can't tell if it's real or fake - and when that happens, you question everything and switch off. I think people will retreat into physical spaces, into high-trust, smaller local communities driven by subscription mechanics where you know you're dealing with real people and real content. Third spaces. Away from the big platforms. Maybe.
Charlotte: The pendulum always swings back. A lot of podcasts are already introducing audio watermarks that say "guaranteed human." I think that will become a certification that people actively chase. It's something Audio Network already does - music made by humans, always.
Peter: My kids are in their twenties, and they're doing less social media. They're going to more live shows, being very discerning about what's real. They're spending a huge amount of time on podcasting - proper educational podcasting as well as conversational. That feels like a signal.
Audience Q&A
Q: How do organisations like Sky, Insanity, and Arcades like to receive music from people they've never heard of?
Jordan: Honestly, I don't think creators really receive much music at all - which is the opportunity. In five years with the Sidemen's management, I've never once seen an unsolicited track arrive in the inbox. It's just not on people's radar. Yet.
Charlotte: Same. We'd genuinely welcome it, especially now that we're commissioning original music for podcasts. If you want to be added to the books and given a brief to write music for a show, get in touch.
Peter: We've always had an open door. We hold a digital library of around 15 million tracks and our music supervision team genuinely enjoy engaging with new music and new people. The practical things: make it easily playable, easily downloadable, metadata all correct. And it's got to be great.
Q: Is the production quality of YouTube going up while the quality of music available is going down, because copyright systems make it too hard to use the best tracks?
Jordan: That's exactly the paradox. The Sidemen documentary in 2023 - we had copyright clearance problems everywhere, and you just think: this was going on Netflix. For some of those artists, the profile and presence would have been worth so much more than their teams making it impossible to clear. But look - all I can see is that the demand for great music is going one way. Creators are going to constantly raise the bar because they need to retain audiences and drive engagement. Between that, the growth of brand commissioning, and the decentralisation of the whole landscape, it's super exciting.
Q: Where does the opportunity lie for artists and musicians to collaborate with creators directly - and does the transactional mindset around licensing get in the way?
Jordan: Fred again.. jumping on a Kick stream with Skepta and making a song that goes massively viral - that's going to become more and more common. But the minute a label tries to track every single clip and extract every penny, you destroy the essence of what made it special. You turn a cultural moment into a transaction. The visibility, the mind share, the global appeal from something like that does more for those artists in terms of relevance than chasing down every usage ever will. Live touring goes up, publishing goes up, everything gets boosted by the visibility. Hopefully the evolution is towards a more strategic, creative-first mindset rather than a chokehold one.
Peter: What TV has is longer time scales - you can bring in the artist's manager and make the case properly. As soon as the manager's on side, they'll bring the label and publisher with them if it's genuinely good for the artist. That's really the key.
Q: When you're picking music, is there a strategy for finding something that might go viral? Or is it organic?
Jordan: Mostly it's the editors being led by the creative and the mood. What I do think is increasingly important is the clip value - having something with immediate visceral impact in the track, because everything gets clipped. If that opening sequence becomes effective on TikTok or social in the first five or six seconds, you're condensing the magic of the track into the bit that travels the furthest. That's probably more important than any formal planning.
Q: AI - where does it fit in? Are you using it, going against it, or somewhere in between?
Peter: There are real copyright issues first of all - if you're making content you need to sell around the world, unknown ownership is a problem. And we run our own library, so AI-generated music with unclear provenance doesn't work commercially for us. But even before you get to the moral question about supporting human creators - is it actually good enough? We've tested it. At the moment it isn't, for what we want. That will change, but that's where we are.
Charlotte: Very similar. Even with AI image generation for thumbnails - AI scrapes existing images, those are owned by someone, so copyright issues remain. We've tried AI social clippers for podcast moments, and they're just not as good as human editors.
Rebecca: It'll make the standards go up. More trash means anything that feels premium and well-made stands out more. The value of great human-made content and music is only going to increase as a result.
Jordan: From Audio Network's perspective - we're proudly human-made and we don't accept AI-generated music. Full stop. We need that warranty to give our clients confidence. Human talent will always win out, and it's worth the premium. But there is a place for AI on the back end - in search and discovery, helping an editor find the right track faster, getting the right cut-downs. So there's definitely a role. I just want AI to do my laundry, not my art. As much as everyone in this room can be the guardian of that, that's the place to be.
Watch the Full Panel
Prefer to watch the conversation in full? The entire panel is available on our YouTube channel - including the audience Q&A.
Ready to Find Music for Your Content?
At Audio Network, we create world-class music for brands and businesses, crafted by award-winning composers and performed by the finest musicians. With simple global licensing and total copyright peace of mind, we make it easy to elevate your content and support your creative vision every step of the way.
THE EVOLUTION OF SYNC: AUDIO NETWORK’S GREAT ESCAPE 2026 PANEL Read More »








You must be logged in to post a comment.